<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the word hoard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordhoard.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordhoard.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on not red but how you paint it by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://wordhoard.co.uk/2012/03/20/being-unoriginal/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordhoard.co.uk/?p=351#comment-116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a pleasure to discover your site. I look forward to reading more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a pleasure to discover your site. I look forward to reading more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on not red but how you paint it by the word hoard</title>
		<link>http://wordhoard.co.uk/2012/03/20/being-unoriginal/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the word hoard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordhoard.co.uk/?p=351#comment-115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks Daniel, you&#039;ve made better sense of what I was trying to say. I love the idea of originality as always connecting us back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks Daniel, you&#8217;ve made better sense of what I was trying to say. I love the idea of originality as always connecting us back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on not red but how you paint it by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://wordhoard.co.uk/2012/03/20/being-unoriginal/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordhoard.co.uk/?p=351#comment-114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed reading your article - in particular your thoughts on the meaning of originality, which I agree seems to be confused with novelty by many (most?) of the cultural arbiters our times. You mention the importance of experience and tradition. Perhaps this can be pursued further by looking more closely at the actual meaning of the word original. Something is original if it refers to, or carries the spirit of, the Origin. Our Origin is certainly boundlessly creative and surges forward manifesting new forms, however, perhaps the most important quality of originality is that it looks backward in acknowledging this one boundless Source from which beauty pours. Originality then is a recognition and affirmation of what precedes us, what gives us form and manifests us. Its gaze is backwards rather than forwards, and the merely novel is of no value if it does not bring us to remembrance of that Source or carry its spirit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading your article &#8211; in particular your thoughts on the meaning of originality, which I agree seems to be confused with novelty by many (most?) of the cultural arbiters our times. You mention the importance of experience and tradition. Perhaps this can be pursued further by looking more closely at the actual meaning of the word original. Something is original if it refers to, or carries the spirit of, the Origin. Our Origin is certainly boundlessly creative and surges forward manifesting new forms, however, perhaps the most important quality of originality is that it looks backward in acknowledging this one boundless Source from which beauty pours. Originality then is a recognition and affirmation of what precedes us, what gives us form and manifests us. Its gaze is backwards rather than forwards, and the merely novel is of no value if it does not bring us to remembrance of that Source or carry its spirit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on not red but how you paint it by TheStm198</title>
		<link>http://wordhoard.co.uk/2012/03/20/being-unoriginal/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheStm198]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordhoard.co.uk/?p=351#comment-62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite an impressive article !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite an impressive article !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on wolf scarers by Album covers &#124; Angela Guyton</title>
		<link>http://wordhoard.co.uk/wolf-scarers/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Album covers &#124; Angela Guyton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordhoard.co.uk/?page_id=325#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] buy any of these from the artists themselves I&#8217;ve included links for that below the images. Wolf Scarers &#8211; Throat house paint, plaster, and ink on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] buy any of these from the artists themselves I&#8217;ve included links for that below the images. Wolf Scarers &#8211; Throat house paint, plaster, and ink on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

